| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| lord of caledor |
Posted - 13 Nov 2003 : 20:57:43
wich one do you think is better
north and south or waterloo
give me your reasons also
|
| 2 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| beherbie |
Posted - 28 Nov 2003 : 23:14:38
Hi Lord of caledor,
in totally agree with jhon and also prefer N&S.;
In additon I could give you the following hints:
Waterloo is playable in one evening, in my case one full game needs 3-5 hours.
N&S; needs much longer (if you play it with a good strategic gamer). We need 2-4 evenings and every evening takes 3-5 hours, buy using the most extention rules. Someone had told me he's playing N&S; much shorter. It's a little opposit to my experiences.
Have a nice try,
beherbie |
| jhon |
Posted - 21 Nov 2003 : 15:16:39
quote:
[i]Originally posted by lord of caledor[/i]
[br]wich one do you think is better
north and south or waterloo
give me your reasons also
I prefer n&s;
N&S; is long term strategie. No suprises
Waterloo is medium term strategie and the action cards do cause for some suprises.
Waterloo has a larger luck-factor than N&S;, also due to the cards. This does make waterloo more appropriate for those wha are less gifted with a strategic mind.
Conclusion, I prefer N&S;, but play Waterloo more often because I can find players more easy.
wkr,
Jhon
Liever verliezen, dan winnen door geluk!
(Wat hierboven geschreven staat weerspiegelt mijn eigen, persoonlijke mening.) |
|
|
All Forums
n&s; or waterloo